• Shilpee Sinha, Shannon Countryman, Ami Patel, Chelsea Powell, James E Slaven, Amber R Comer, and Alexia M Torke.
• IUH Department of Palliative Care, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN; Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. Electronic address: ssinha@iuhealth.org.
• Am. J. Med. 2024 Dec 5.

BackgroundGoals of care (GOC) documentation for seriously ill patients is integral to patient-centered care but not standardized. Collaborative efforts within the health system to improve the frequency and documentation of GOC to communicate patient preferences and values are essential to ensure both quality of life and quality of death.MeasuresWe created a standard GOC note type and location in the electronic medical record for a large, statewide health system in the Midwest. Utilization and note content for all unique GOC note types documented in the first year were reviewed. A framework of GOC topics including treatment plan, prognosis, patient preferences and values, and quality of life was used to review the note content. Demographic data and outcomes including death during the observation period and hospice enrollment were also collected.OutcomesIn the first year, 934 GOC notes were documented. Palliative care (PC) clinicians addressed more GOC fields compared to other clinicians (70% vs 31%, P < .0001) and had earlier discussions (median 19 days before death vs 4 days, P < .0001). Hospice was discussed more by PC (50% vs 27%, P = .0001) and PC discussions were followed by higher hospice enrollments before death (50% vs 35% P = .0166).ConclusionsWe successfully implemented a standard electronic medical record location for GOC notes which improved GOC documentation across a state healthcare system and found variations and gaps in fields addressed by all clinicians as well as key differences between PC clinicians vs other clinicians.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

4 keywords...

hide…