• Janie Faris, Kareem R Abdelfattah, Audra T Clark, Benjamin Levi, and Rebecca Coffey.
• Parkland Health, 5200 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
• Burns. 2024 Dec 20; 51 (2): 107360107360.

AbstractHealth and racial disparities can limit access to preventative, trauma, and chronic disease care but have not been addressed in burn resuscitation. Over- and under-resuscitation contribute to increased overall hospital costs, and morbidity and mortality rates. The primary objective of this study was to identify potential racial disparities that may exist during the initial fluid resuscitation after burn injury. This was a retrospective review of all burn patients > 14 years of age admitted between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022 to a county safety net hospital. Patients were excluded if they transitioned to comfort care within 24 hours of admission. Data collected included baseline demographics, relevant burn injury information, and laboratory parameters. Outcomes included hospital and ICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, payor status, and mortality. Patients were divided into white (59 %) vs. African American-Hispanic (AA-HIS) (41 %) and included 105 patients. The median age (IQR) was 44.5(30) for whites vs 34(36) for AA-HIS. There were no statistically significant differences in severity of burn injury, cause of burn injury, rates of inhalation injury, or ICU or hospital lengths of stay. In both groups 55 % of the patients required mechanical ventilation while 18 % required renal replacement therapy. Overall mortality was not higher in the AA-HIS group at 32.6 % vs 17.7 % (p = 0.081). There were no differences in amount of fluid administered, urine output, laboratory values during resuscitation, or patient outcomes between the groups. The use of protocols for burn resuscitation can be instrumental in protecting against racial and ethnic disparities.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

7 keywords...

hide…