-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jan 2025
Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in the Resternotomy Setting.
- Megan M Chung, Kavya Rajesh, Chris He, Yanling Zhao, Yu Hohri, Valeria Jimenez, Gift Owolabi, Elizabeth Norton, Paul Kurlansky, Bradley Leshnower, Edward P Chen, and Hiroo Takayama.
- Divison of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
- J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2025 Jan 10.
ObjectivesAlthough valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) has demonstrated satisfactory outcomes, its utility in reoperative sternotomy settings remains uncertain. This study evaluates the perioperative safety and long-term durability of reoperative sternotomy VSRR.MethodsAll consecutive VSRR procedures at 2 centers from 2005 to 2020 were included. Reoperative VSRR was defined as prior sternotomy for any reason. Time-dependent outcomes were compared between groups after balancing of covariates with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Multivariable Cox regression and the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model were used to identify factors associated with 10-year survival and aortic valve reintervention, respectively.ResultsOf 778 VSRR procedures, 69 (8.9%) were reoperative sternotomies. Compared with primary, patients undergoing reoperative VSRR were younger (age 43 years [range, 34-54 years] vs age 51 years [range, 39-61 years]; P < .001) and had less aortic insufficiency (33.3% vs 48.5%; P = .02). Cardiopulmonary bypass times were longer in reoperative VSRR with similar rates of circulatory arrest. Reoperative VSRR had a higher incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (10.1% vs 3.2%; P = .01) and prolonged ventilation (24.6% vs 9.9%; P < .001); operative mortality was higher in reoperative VSRR (2.9% [2 out of 69] vs 1.4% [10 out of 709]) although not significantly (P = .66). Ten-year survival was 82.0% (range, 70.0%-96.0%) and aortic valve reintervention rate was 11.8% (range, 2.3%-19.4%) after reoperative VSRR. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, survival and aortic valve reintervention rates were not different. Reoperative sternotomy was not associated with long-term mortality (P = .13) or aortic valve reintervention (P = .77) on multivariable analysis.ConclusionsAlthough complex, reoperative sternotomy VSRR can be performed with low operative mortality in carefully selected patients. Ten-year survival and aortic valve reintervention rates were acceptable and comparable to primary VSRR.Copyright © 2025 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.