-
Review Meta Analysis
Is the Use of Tourniquets More Advantageous than Other Bleeding Control Techniques in Patients with Limb Hemorrhage? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Roberto Cirocchi, Dominica Prigorschi, Luca Properzi, Matteo Matteucci, Francesca Duro, Giovanni Domenico Tebala, Bruno Cirillo, Paolo Sapienza, Gioia Brachini, Sara Lauricella, Diletta Cassini, Antonia Rizzuto, and Andrea Mingoli.
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery, University of Perugia, 06123 Perugia, Italy.
- Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 9; 61 (1).
AbstractBackground and Objectives: Trauma, particularly uncontrolled bleeding, is a major cause of death. Recent evidence-based guidelines recommend the use of a tourniquet when life-threating limb bleeding cannot be controlled with direct pressure. Prehospital hemorrhage management, according to the XABCDE protocol, emphasizes the critical role of tourniquets in controlling massive bleeding. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize data from the available scientific literature on the effectiveness of prehospital tourniquet use for extremity bleeding. Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed between March 2022 and March 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, to determine whether prehospital tourniquets are clinically effective. The protocol was published on PROSPERO (ID number: CRD42023450373). Results: A comprehensive literature search yielded 925 articles and 11 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The analysis showed a non-statistically significant reduction in mortality risk with tourniquet application (4.02% vs. 6.43%, RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.07). Analysis of outcomes of amputation of the traumatized limb indicated a statistically higher incidence of initial amputation in the tourniquet group (19.32% vs. 6.4%, RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.21-3.52), while delayed amputation showed no difference (9.39% vs. 3.66%, RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.42-2.07). Tourniquet use demonstrated a non-significant reduction in the number of blood components transfused (MD = -0.65; 95% CI -5.23 to 3.93 for pRBC, MD = -0.55; 95% CI -4.06 to 2.97 for plasma). Conclusions: Despite increasing use in civilian settings, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed no significant reduction in mortality or blood product use associated with prehospital tourniquet use. Further research, including high-quality randomized controlled trials, is required, as well as awareness and education campaigns relating to proper tourniquet use in the prehospital setting.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.