• Critical care medicine · Apr 2010

    Clinical Trial

    Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocols on hospital length of stay and mortality in septic shock patients: results of a three-year follow-up quasi-experimental study.

    • Alvaro Castellanos-Ortega, Borja Suberviola, Luis A García-Astudillo, María S Holanda, Fernando Ortiz, Javier Llorca, and Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez.
    • Intensive Care Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain. acastellanos@humv.es
    • Crit. Care Med. 2010 Apr 1;38(4):1036-43.

    ObjectivesTo describe the effectiveness of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles with regard to both implementation and outcome in patients with septic shock and to determine the contribution of the various elements of the bundles to the outcome.DesignQuasi-experimental study with a historical comparison group.SettingThe three medical-surgical intensive care units of an academic tertiary care center.PatientsA total of 384 adult patients in septic shock were enrolled after the educational intervention (September 2005-August 2008) and 96 patients in the historical group (June 2004-May 2005).InterventionA hospital-wide quality improvement program based on the implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines performed between June 2005 and August 2005.Measurements And ResultsIn-hospital mortality was reduced from 57.3% in the historical group to 37.5% in the intervention group (p = .001). This difference remained significant after controlling for confounding factors (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.89). The intervention group had also lower length of stay for survivors in the hospital (36.2 +/- 34.8 days vs. 41.0 +/- 26.3 days; p = .043) and in the intensive care units (8.4 +/- 9.8 days vs. 11.0 +/- 9.5 days; p = .004). Improvements in survival were related to the number of bundle interventions completed (p for trend <.001). Compliance with six or more interventions of the 6-hr resuscitation bundle was an independent predictor of survival (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.53; p <.001). The only single intervention with impact on mortality was the achievement of ScvO2 > or =70% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.99; p = .048).ConclusionsThe implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines was associated with a significant decrease in mortality. The benefits depend on the number of interventions accomplished within the time limits. The 6-hr resuscitation bundle showed greater compliance and effectiveness than the 24-hr management bundle.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…