-
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Apr 2012
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyFresh red blood cell transfusion and short-term pulmonary, immunologic, and coagulation status: a randomized clinical trial.
- Daryl J Kor, Rahul Kashyap, Richard B Weiskopf, Gregory A Wilson, Camille M van Buskirk, Jeffrey L Winters, Michael Malinchoc, Rolf D Hubmayr, and Ognjen Gajic.
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. kor.daryl@mayo.edu
- Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.. 2012 Apr 15;185(8):842-50.
RationaleTransfusion-related pulmonary complications are leading causes of morbidity and mortality attributed to transfusion. Observational studies suggest an important role for red blood cell (RBC) storage duration in these adverse outcomes.ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of RBC storage duration on short-term pulmonary function as well as immunologic and coagulation status in mechanically ventilated patients receiving RBC transfusion.MethodsThis is a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial comparing fresh (≤5 d of storage) versus standard issue single-unit RBC transfusion in adult intubated and mechanically ventilated patients. The primary outcome is the change in pulmonary gas exchange as assessed by the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen concentration ratio (ΔPa(O(2))/Fi(O(2))). Secondary outcomes include changes in immune and coagulation status.Measurements And Main ResultsFifty patients were randomized to receive fresh RBCs and an additional 50 patients to standard issue RBCs. Median storage age was 4.0 days (interquartile range, 3.0-5.0) and 26.5 days (interquartile range, 21.0-36.0) in the fresh RBC group and standard issue RBC group, respectively. No differences were noted in the primary outcome of ΔPa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) (difference between the mean ΔPa(O(2))/Fi(O(2)) in the standard issue RBC group vs. the fresh RBC group, -11.5; 95% confidence interval, -35.3 to 12.3; P = 0.22). Similarly, no significant differences were noted in markers of immunologic or coagulation status.ConclusionsIn this randomized clinical trial, no differences were noted in early measures of pulmonary function or in immunologic or coagulation status when comparing fresh versus standard issue single-unit RBC transfusion. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00751322).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.