• Ann Emerg Med · Sep 2007

    Comparative Study

    A comparison of plastic single-use with metallic reusable laryngoscope blades for out-of-hospital tracheal intubation.

    • Patricia Jabre, Bertrand Leroux, Stéphanie Brohon, Candice Penet, David Lockey, Frederic Adnet, Alain Margenet, Jean Marty, and Xavier Combes.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Service d'Urgence et de Réanimation 94, Créteil, France.
    • Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Sep 1;50(3):258-63.

    Study ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare, in the emergency out-of-hospital environment, intubation success rates during the first laryngoscopy for 2 laryngoscope blade types: a metallic reusable and a plastic single-use.MethodsAn observational before-and-after study was conducted during 2 1-year periods. Adult patients were intubated by emergency physicians, anesthesiologists, or anesthesia nurses in the out-of-hospital setting with metallic reusable (first period) or a plastic disposable (second period) Macintosh 3 or 4 laryngoscope blades. Immediately after intubation, data were collected on success rate of intubation at the first attempt, intubation difficulty score, quality of laryngeal visualization, and the need for alternative airway techniques. To compare the 2 periods of the study, Wilcoxon's test was used for quantitative variables, and the chi2 or Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables.ResultsPatients intubated with a metallic blade (594/1,177; 50.5%) and with a plastic blade (583/1,177; 49.5%) were included in the study. The first-attempt intubation success rate was higher in the metallic blade group (497/594, 84%) than in the single-use group (76%); difference 7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3% to 12%) (P<.002). The incidence of difficult intubation, defined by an intubation difficulty score greater than 5, was lower (6% [95% CI 4% to 8%] versus 15% [95% CI 12% to 18%]) when metallic blades were used. A good laryngeal view (Cormack and Lehane classes I and II) was more frequently observed with metallic blade use (83% [95% CI 80% to 86%] versus 67% [95% CI 64% to 70%]). Alternative airway techniques such as the use of a Gum elastic bougie or an intubating laryngeal mask airway were more frequently used in the plastic blade period (12% [95% CI 10% to 14%] versus 4% [95% CI 2% to 6%]).ConclusionIn out-of-hospital emergency care, the use of a plastic disposable laryngoscope blade decreased the success rate of tracheal intubation at the first attempt performed by emergency care providers.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.