• Ann. Intern. Med. · Dec 2012

    Review Meta Analysis

    Epidural corticosteroid injections in the management of sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Rafael Zambelli Pinto, Chris G Maher, Manuela L Ferreira, Mark Hancock, Vinicius C Oliveira, Andrew J McLachlan, Bart Koes, and Paulo H Ferreira.
    • The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. rafaelzambelli@gmail.com
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2012 Dec 18;157(12):865-77.

    BackgroundExisting guidelines and systematic reviews provide inconsistent recommendations on epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica. Key limitations of existing reviews are the inclusion of trials with active controls of unknown efficacy and failure to provide an estimate of the size of the treatment effect.PurposeTo determine the efficacy of epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica compared with placebo.Data SourcesInternational Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL.Study SelectionRandomized, placebo-controlled trials assessing the efficacy of epidural corticosteroid injections in participants with sciatica.Data ExtractionTwo independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Leg pain, back pain, and disability were converted to common scales from 0 (no pain or disability) to 100 (worst possible pain or disability). Thresholds for clinically important change in the range of 10 to 30 have been proposed for these outcomes. Effects were calculated for short-term (>2 weeks but ≤3 months) and long-term (≥12 months) follow-up.Data SynthesisData were pooled with a random-effects model, and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used in summary conclusions. Twenty-five published reports (23 trials) were included. The pooled results showed a significant, although small, effect of epidural corticosteroid injections compared with placebo for leg pain in the short term (mean difference, -6.2 [95% CI, -9.4 to -3.0]) and also for disability in the short term (mean difference, -3.1 [CI, -5.0 to -1.2]). The long-term pooled effects were smaller and not statistically significant. The overall quality of evidence according to the GRADE classification was rated as high.LimitationThe review included only English-language trials and could not incorporate dichotomous outcome measures into the analysis.ConclusionThe available evidence suggests that epidural corticosteroid injections offer only short-term relief of leg pain and disability for patients with sciatica. The small size of the treatment effects, however, raises questions about the clinical utility of this procedure in the target population.Primary Funding SourceNone.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…