• J. Clin. Oncol. · Dec 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Phase III comparison of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal women with node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (E-3193, INT-0142): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

    • Amye J Tevaarwerk, Molin Wang, Fengmin Zhao, John H Fetting, David Cella, Lynne I Wagner, Silvana Martino, James N Ingle, Joseph A Sparano, Lawrence J Solin, William C Wood, and Nicholas J Robert.
    • Amye J. Tevaarwerk, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Molin Wang, Harvard University; Fengmin Zhao, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; John H. Fetting, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; David Cella and Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Silvana Martino, Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; James N. Ingle, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Joseph A. Sparano, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Lawrence J. Solin, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA; William C. Wood, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and Nicholas J. Robert, Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA. at4@medicine.wisc.edu.
    • J. Clin. Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;32(35):3948-58.

    PurposeThe effects of ovarian function suppression (OFS) on survival and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated in a phase III trial in which premenopausal women were randomly assigned to tamoxifen with or without OFS.Patients And MethodsPremenopausal women with axillary node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer tumors measuring ≤ 3 cm were randomly assigned to tamoxifen alone versus tamoxifen plus OFS; adjuvant chemotherapy was not permitted. Primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included toxicity and patient-reported outcomes. Patient-reported outcome data included health-related quality of life, menopausal symptoms, and sexual function. These were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually for up to 5 years after registration.ResultsIn all, 345 premenopausal women were enrolled: 171 on tamoxifen alone and 174 on tamoxifen plus OFS. With a median follow-up of 9.9 years, there was no significant difference between arms for DFS (5-year rate: 87.9% v 89.7%; log-rank P = .62) or OS (5-year rate: 95.2% v 97.6%; log-rank P = .67). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was more common in the tamoxifen plus OFS arm (22.4% v 12.3%; P = .004). Patients treated with tamoxifen plus OFS had more menopausal symptoms, lower sexual activity, and inferior health-related quality of life at 3-year follow-up (P < .01 for all). Differences diminished with further follow-up.ConclusionWhen added to tamoxifen, OFS results in more menopausal symptoms and sexual dysfunction, which contributes to inferior self-reported health-related quality of life. Because of early closure, this study is underpowered for drawing conclusions about the impact on survival when adding OFS to tamoxifen.© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…