-
Comparative Study
The gender gap in academic medicine: comparing results from a multifaceted intervention for stanford faculty to peer and national cohorts.
- Hannah A Valantine, Daisy Grewal, Manwai Candy Ku, Julie Moseley, Mei-Chiung Shih, David Stevenson, and Philip A Pizzo.
- Dr. Valantine is professor of medicine and senior associate dean for diversity and leadership, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Grewal is associate director, Office of Diversity and Leadership, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Ku is program director and senior research scientist, Office of Diversity and Leadership, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Moseley is director of organizational effectiveness, Office of Diversity and Leadership, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Shih is assistant professor of biostatistics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Stevenson is vice dean and senior associate dean for academic affairs, Harold K. Faber Professor of Pediatrics, and professor, by courtesy, of obstetrics and gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Dr. Pizzo is David and Susan Heckerman Professor of Pediatrics and of Microbiology and Immunology and former dean of the School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
- Acad Med. 2014 Jun 1;89(6):904-11.
PurposeTo assess whether the proportion of women faculty, especially at the full professor rank, increased from 2004 to 2010 at Stanford University School of Medicine after a multifaceted intervention.MethodThe authors surveyed gender composition and faculty satisfaction five to seven years after initiating a multifaceted intervention to expand recruitment and development of women faculty. The authors assessed pre/post relative change and rates of increase in women faculty at each rank, and faculty satisfaction; and differences in pre/post change and estimated rate of increase between Stanford and comparator cohorts (nationally and at peer institutions).ResultsPost intervention, women faculty increased by 74% (234 to 408), with assistant, associate, and full professors increasing by 66% (108 to 179), 87% (74 to 138), and 75% (52 to 91), respectively. Nationally and at peer institutions, women faculty increased by about 30% (30,230 to 39,200 and 4,370 to 5,754, respectively), with lower percentages at each rank compared with Stanford. Estimated difference (95% CI) in annual rate of increase was larger for Stanford versus the national cohort: combined ranks 0.36 (0.17 to 0.56), P = .001; full professor 0.40 (0.18 to 0.62), P = .001; and versus the peer cohort: combined ranks 0.29 (0.07 to 0.51), P = .02; full professor 0.37 (0.14 to 0.60), P = .003. Stanford women faculty satisfaction increased from 48% (2003) to 71% (2008).ConclusionsIncreased satisfaction and proportion of women faculty, especially full professors, suggest that the intervention may ameliorate the gender gap in academic medicine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.