• Ann. Intern. Med. · Mar 2012

    Multicenter Study

    Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods study.

    • Lucas S Zier, Peter D Sottile, Seo Yeon Hong, Lisa A Weissfield, and Douglas B White.
    • University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0119, USA.
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2012 Mar 6; 156 (5): 360366360-6.

    BackgroundLittle is known about why surrogate decision makers for patients with advanced illness often have overly optimistic expectations about prognosis.ObjectiveTo determine how surrogates interpret prognostic statements and to explore factors influencing surrogates' interpretations of grim prognostic information.DesignMulticenter, mixed-methods study.SettingIntensive care units of 3 hospitals in San Francisco, California.Participants80 surrogates of critically ill patients.MeasurementsParticipants recorded their interpretation of 16 prognostic statements using a standard probability scale. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine whether participants interpreted statements more optimistically as the expressed probability of survival decreased. Fifteen surrogates whose responses exhibited this trend participated in a semistructured interview.ResultsParticipants' interpretations of prognostic statements expressing a low risk for death were relatively accurate, but interpretations of statements conveying a high risk for death were more optimistic than the actual meaning (P < 0.001; generalized estimating equation model). Interpretations of the statement "90% chance of surviving" did not differ from the actual meaning, but interpretations of "5% chance of surviving" were more optimistic and showed substantial variability (median, 90% [interquartile range, 90% to 95%; P = 0.11] vs. 15% [interquartile range, 5% to 40%; P < 0.001], respectively). Two main themes from the interviews explained this trend: surrogates' need to register optimism in the face of a poor prognosis and surrogates' belief that patient attributes unknown to the physician would lead to better-than-predicted outcomes.LimitationSurrogates' interpretations were elicited in an experimental setting rather than during actual clinician-surrogate conversations.ConclusionInaccurate interpretations of physicians' prognostications by surrogates arise partly from optimistic biases rather than simply from misunderstandings.Primary Funding SourceNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,706,642 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.