-
Multicenter Study
Surrogate decision makers' interpretation of prognostic information: a mixed-methods study.
- Lucas S Zier, Peter D Sottile, Seo Yeon Hong, Lisa A Weissfield, and Douglas B White.
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0119, USA.
- Ann. Intern. Med. 2012 Mar 6; 156 (5): 360366360-6.
BackgroundLittle is known about why surrogate decision makers for patients with advanced illness often have overly optimistic expectations about prognosis.ObjectiveTo determine how surrogates interpret prognostic statements and to explore factors influencing surrogates' interpretations of grim prognostic information.DesignMulticenter, mixed-methods study.SettingIntensive care units of 3 hospitals in San Francisco, California.Participants80 surrogates of critically ill patients.MeasurementsParticipants recorded their interpretation of 16 prognostic statements using a standard probability scale. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine whether participants interpreted statements more optimistically as the expressed probability of survival decreased. Fifteen surrogates whose responses exhibited this trend participated in a semistructured interview.ResultsParticipants' interpretations of prognostic statements expressing a low risk for death were relatively accurate, but interpretations of statements conveying a high risk for death were more optimistic than the actual meaning (P < 0.001; generalized estimating equation model). Interpretations of the statement "90% chance of surviving" did not differ from the actual meaning, but interpretations of "5% chance of surviving" were more optimistic and showed substantial variability (median, 90% [interquartile range, 90% to 95%; P = 0.11] vs. 15% [interquartile range, 5% to 40%; P < 0.001], respectively). Two main themes from the interviews explained this trend: surrogates' need to register optimism in the face of a poor prognosis and surrogates' belief that patient attributes unknown to the physician would lead to better-than-predicted outcomes.LimitationSurrogates' interpretations were elicited in an experimental setting rather than during actual clinician-surrogate conversations.ConclusionInaccurate interpretations of physicians' prognostications by surrogates arise partly from optimistic biases rather than simply from misunderstandings.Primary Funding SourceNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.