• Alfred I Tauber.
• Centre for Philosophy and History of Science, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. ait@bu.edu
• Med. J. Aust. 2003 May 5;178(9):454-6.

AbstractRationing, the equitable allocation of medical resources, is both an economic and moral challenge--economic, because the various components of healthcare must be budgeted; moral, because the prioritisation of these resources is a value-laden decision. The moral debate about rationing pits individual choice against communal interests. The advocacy of equitable distribution of healthcare resources originates in arguments for distributive justice and a revised version of individual autonomy. If autonomy is defined strictly in terms of atomistic individuality, then the social obligations and duties of persons are subordinated to their individual rights. Alternatively, when people are defined by their relationships, "relational autonomy" balances responsibilities against the claims of individual rights to maximise distributive justice. The concept of relational autonomy provides medicine with a philosophical basis for communal rationing of healthcare resources.

14 keywords...

hide…