• JACC Cardiovasc Imaging · Mar 2012

    Multicenter Study

    Longitudinal distribution of plaque burden and necrotic core-rich plaques in nonculprit lesions of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes.

    • Joanna J Wykrzykowska, Gary S Mintz, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Akiko Maehara, Martin Fahy, Ke Xu, Andres Inguez, Jean Fajadet, Alexandra Lansky, Barry Templin, Zhen Zhang, Bernard de Bruyne, Giora Weisz, Patrick W Serruys, and Gregg W Stone.
    • Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
    • JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Mar 1;5(3 Suppl):S10-8.

    ObjectivesIn this substudy of the PROSPECT (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree) study, we examined the longitudinal distribution of atherosclerotic plaque burden, virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) characterized necrotic core (NC) content and VH-thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) distribution in nonculprit lesions of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes.BackgroundPrevious analyses suggested that vulnerable plaques and acute myocardial infarction may occur more frequently in the proximal than the distal coronary tree.MethodsA total of 4,234 proximal, mid, and distal 30-mm-long segments of each epicardial coronary artery were compared with each other and to the left main coronary artery (LMCA).ResultsCombining IVUS data from all 3 arteries, there was a gradient in plaque burden from the proximal (42.4%) to mid (37.6%) to distal (32.6%) 30-mm-long segments (p < 0.0001). Overall, 67.4% of proximal, 41.0% of mid, and 29.7% of distal 30-mm-long segments contained at least 1 lesion (plaque burden >40%). Proportion of NC, however, was similar in the proximal and mid 30-mm-long segments of all arteries (10.3% [interquartile range (IQR): 4.8% to 16.7%] vs. 10.6% [IQR: 5.0% to 18.1%], p = 0.25), but less in the distal 30-mm-long segment (9.1% [IQR: 3.7% to 17.8%], p = 0.03 compared with the proximal segment and p = 0.003 compared with the mid segment). Overall, 17.3% of proximal, 11.5% of mid, and 9.1% of distal 30-mm-long segments had at least 1 lesion that was classified as VH-TCFA (p < 0.0001). Comparing the LMCA with the combined cohort of proximal left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery 30-mm-long segments: 1) plaque burden was less (35.4% [IQR: 28.8% to 43.5%] vs. 40.9% [IQR: 33.3% to 48.0%], p < 0.0001); 2) fewer LMCAs contained at least 1 lesion (17.5%, p < 0.0001); 3) there was less NC (6.5% [IQR: 2.9% to 12.2%] vs. 9.3% [IQR: 4.3% to 15.9%], p < 0.0001); and 4) LMCAs rarely contained a VH-TCFA (1.8%, p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe current analysis appears to confirm that lesions that are responsible for acute coronary events (large, plaque burden-rich in NC) are somewhat more likely to be present in the proximal than the distal coronary tree, except for the LMCA.Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…