• G Parkin, C Wright, R Bellomo, and N Boyce.
• Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
• J Crit Care. 1994 Jun 1; 9 (2): 124-33.

PurposeTo assess the use and validity of a mean systemic filling pressure analogue (Pmsa) in the closed-loop control of fluid replacement in continuous hemodiafiltration.MethodsCardiovascular variables were computer acquired from bedside monitor. Pmsa was calculated and compared with a target value. Gravitational fluid replacement to the extracorporeal hemodiafiltration circuit was regulated with a computer-controlled clamp.ResultsTen patients (mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, 29.7; range, 21-33) received continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration for acute renal failure. Fluid replacement therapy was closed loop controlled to a target Pmsa for a total of 601 hours. During this period, 417 L of ultradiafiltrate were lost, and 409 L of replacement and nutritional fluids were administered. Despite such large fluid shifts, measured hemodynamic variables were kept within a narrow range (hour to hour variability: right atrial pressure, 1 +/- 0.1 mm Hg; mean arterial pressure 5.9 +/- 0.5 mm Hg; cardiac index, 0.44 +/- 0.05 L/m2/min). No complications of the technique occurred.ConclusionsThe stability of cardiovascular variables achieved during Pmsa-based fluid replacement of critically ill patients with major fluid losses supports the validity of the use of the Pmsa as a measure of intravascular volume status. Such an analogue may be useful in nondialytic environments. The use of Pmsa as the basis for automated fluid replacement was safe.

24 keywords...

hide…