• J Clin Anesth · May 2000

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Rapid induction of anesthesia with high concentrations of halothane or sevoflurane in children.

    • Y Morimoto, J F Mayhew, S L Knox, and M H Zornow.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555-0591, USA.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2000 May 1;12(3):184-8.

    Study ObjectiveTo compare the characteristics of the rapid induction of anesthesia in pediatric patients with high concentrations of sevoflurane or halothane, and to determine the ability of anesthesiologists to correctly identify the anesthetic drug when administered in this fashion.DesignRandomized, prospective, open-label study.SettingAcademic university hospital.Patients78 ASA physical status I and II healthy children scheduled for brief surgical procedures with general anesthesia and medicated with midazolam.InterventionsAssessments were made by 5 pediatric anesthesiologists and 18 anesthesiology residents. Sevoflurane or halothane was randomly selected for anesthetic induction. The anesthetic circuit was primed with the drug (8% sevoflurane or 4% halothane) in 50% nitrous oxide and oxygen. The anesthesiologists were blinded as to the anesthetics being administered. After completion of anesthetic induction, the anesthesiologists were asked to identify the anesthetic and to assess the quality and speed of induction.Measurement And Main ResultsThe pediatric anesthesiologists correctly identified the anesthetic in 55 of 78 assessments (70.5%). This figure is statistically better than what could be achieved by random guessing (p < 0.001). The residents correctly identified the anesthetic in only 46 of 78 assessments (60.0%). Statistically, this figure is no better than what could be achieved by random guessing (p = 0.06). Speed of induction was subjectively felt to be faster with sevoflurane than halothane but there were no differences in actual induction time (sevoflurane group, 3.7 +/- 2.7 min; halothane group, 3.7 +/- 2.6 min). There were no differences in the quality of induction or the incidence of airway complications. The perceived incidence of tachycardia was significantly higher with sevoflurane than halothane(sevoflurane group, 74%; halothane group 20%).ConclusionThe induction of anesthesia with high concentrations of either halothane or sevoflurane can be safely accomplished. Pediatric anesthesiologists can differentiate between halothane and sevoflurane when either drug is given in high initial concentrations. The presence of tachycardia may have served as the primary clue in determining which drug was being used.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…