• M Leeda, R Stienstra, M S Arbous, A Dahan, B Th Veering, A G L Burm, and J W Van Kleef.
• Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
• Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Nov 1;22(11):839-42.

Background And ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics of epidural catheter insertion via the midline or the paramedian approach with regard to ease of catheter insertion, incidence of paraesthesias and efficacy of epidural block. In addition to the type of approach, the prognostic value of Patients characteristics variables with regard to the incidence of paraesthesias was assessed.MethodsThirty patients scheduled for surgery under epidural anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups of 15 patients each. Epidural anaesthesia was performed via a midline or paramedian approach using loss of resistance to saline. Variables measured were: time needed to identify the epidural space, time needed for and ease of epidural catheter insertion and the incidence of paraesthesias. After completion of these observations, epidural anaesthesia was established with 150 mg ropivacaine 1%. Efficacy of the epidural block was assessed by the need for intraoperative analgesics and by the patient on a three-point scale (good/fair/poor).ResultsQuality of sensory blockade was adequate in both groups. Catheter insertion was significantly faster using the paramedian approach. The difference between the two approaches with regard to the incidence of paraesthesias was not significant, however, there was a trend towards more paraesthesias in the midline group. In the multivariate analysis, type of approach was an independent significant predictor of paraesthesias and we found a trend towards a higher incidence of paraesthesias in female patients.ConclusionsCatheter insertion was faster in the paramedian group and we found a trend towards a higher incidence of paraesthesias with the midline approach.

17 keywords...

hide…