• SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network, Waldemar A Carlo, Neil N Finer, Michele C Walsh, Wade Rich, Marie G Gantz, Abbot R Laptook, Bradley A Yoder, Roger G Faix, Abhik Das, W Kenneth Poole, Kurt Schibler, Nancy S Newman, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Ivan D Frantz, Anthony J Piazza, Pablo J Sánchez, Brenda H Morris, Nirupama Laroia, Dale L Phelps, Brenda B Poindexter, C Michael Cotten, Krisa P Van Meurs, Shahnaz Duara, Vivek Narendran, Beena G Sood, T Michael O'Shea, Edward F Bell, Richard A Ehrenkranz, Kristi L Watterberg, and Rosemary D Higgins.
• N. Engl. J. Med. 2010 May 27; 362 (21): 1959-69.

BackgroundPrevious studies have suggested that the incidence of retinopathy is lower in preterm infants with exposure to reduced levels of oxygenation than in those exposed to higher levels of oxygenation. However, it is unclear what range of oxygen saturation is appropriate to minimize retinopathy without increasing adverse outcomes.MethodsWe performed a randomized trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design to compare target ranges of oxygen saturation of 85 to 89% or 91 to 95% among 1316 infants who were born between 24 weeks 0 days and 27 weeks 6 days of gestation. The primary outcome was a composite of severe retinopathy of prematurity (defined as the presence of threshold retinopathy, the need for surgical ophthalmologic intervention, or the use of bevacizumab), death before discharge from the hospital, or both. All infants were also randomly assigned to continuous positive airway pressure or intubation and surfactant.ResultsThe rates of severe retinopathy or death did not differ significantly between the lower-oxygen-saturation group and the higher-oxygen-saturation group (28.3% and 32.1%, respectively; relative risk with lower oxygen saturation, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.06; P=0.21). Death before discharge occurred more frequently in the lower-oxygen-saturation group (in 19.9% of infants vs. 16.2%; relative risk, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.60; P=0.04), whereas severe retinopathy among survivors occurred less often in this group (8.6% vs. 17.9%; relative risk, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in the rates of other adverse events.ConclusionsA lower target range of oxygenation (85 to 89%), as compared with a higher range (91 to 95%), did not significantly decrease the composite outcome of severe retinopathy or death, but it resulted in an increase in mortality and a substantial decrease in severe retinopathy among survivors. The increase in mortality is a major concern, since a lower target range of oxygen saturation is increasingly being advocated to prevent retinopathy of prematurity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00233324.)2010 Massachusetts Medical Society

28 keywords...

hide…