• Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 2016

    Review Meta Analysis

    Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • François-Pierrick Desgranges, Olivier Desebbe, Edmundo Pereira de Souza Neto, Darren Raphael, and Dominique Chassard.
    • Department of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Femme Mère Enfant Teaching Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
    • Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Jan 1; 26 (1): 37-47.

    BackgroundDynamic indices of preload have been shown to better predict fluid responsiveness than static variables in mechanically ventilated adults. In children, dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness have not yet been extensively studied.AimTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity (ΔVPeak) for the prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children.MethodPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were screened for studies relevant to the use of ΔVPeak to predict fluid responsiveness in children receiving mechanical ventilation. Clinical trials published as full-text articles in indexed journals without language restriction were included. We calculated the pooled values of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and positive and negative likelihood ratio using a random-effects model.ResultsIn total, six studies (163 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Data are reported as point estimate with 95% confidence interval. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and DOR of ΔVPeak to predict fluid responsiveness for the overall population were 92.0% (84.1-96.7), 85.5% (75.6-92.5), 4.89 (2.92-8.18), 0.13 (0.07-0.25), and 50.44 (17.70-143.74), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94. Cutoff values for ΔVPeak to predict fluid responsiveness varied across studies, ranging from 7% to 20%.ConclusionOur results confirm that the ΔVPeak is an accurate predictor of fluid responsiveness in children under mechanical ventilation. However, the question of the optimal cutoff value of ΔVPeak to predict fluid responsiveness remains uncertain, as there are important variations between original publications, and needs to be resolved in further studies. The potential impact of intraoperative cardiac output optimization using goal-directed fluid therapy based on ΔVPeak on the perioperative outcome in the pediatric population should be subsequently evaluated.© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.