• Critical care medicine · Nov 2001

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial

    Assessment of the safety of recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in patients with severe sepsis: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study.

    • E Abraham, K Reinhart, P Svoboda, A Seibert, D Olthoff, A Dal Nogare, R Postier, G Hempelmann, T Butler, E Martin, C Zwingelstein, S Percell, V Shu, A Leighton, and A A Creasey.
    • Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA. Edward.Abraham@USHSC.edu
    • Crit. Care Med. 2001 Nov 1;29(11):2081-9.

    ObjectiveTo identify a safe and potentially effective recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (rTFPI) dose for further clinical evaluation in patients with severe sepsis.DesignProspective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation, multicenter, multinational phase II clinical trial.SettingThirty-eight intensive care units in the United States and Europe.PatientsTwo hundred and ten subjects with severe sepsis who received standard supportive care and antimicrobial therapy.InterventionsSubjects received a continuous intravenous infusion of placebo or rTFPI at 0.025 or 0.05 mg/kg/hr for 4 days (96 hrs).Measurements And Main ResultsThere were no significant imbalances in demographics, severity of illness, or source of infection in patients randomized to placebo or either dose of rTFPI. A 20% relative reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality was observed when all rTFPI-treated patients were compared with all placebo patients. An improvement in pulmonary organ dysfunction score and in a composite intensive care unit score (pulmonary, cardiovascular, and coagulation) were also noted in the rTFPI-treated patients. Logistic regression modeling indicated a substantial treatment by baseline laboratory international normalized ratio (INR) interaction effect when only treatment and INR were in the model (p =.037) and when baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and log10 interleukin 6 were adjusted for (p =.026). This interaction effect indicates that higher baseline INR is associated with a more pronounced beneficial rTFPI effect. There was no increase in mortality in subjects treated with either dose of rTFPI compared with placebo. Biological activity, as detected by a statistically significant reduction in thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TATc), was noted in the all rTFPI-treated patients compared with those receiving placebo. There were no major imbalances across all treatment groups with respect to safety. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs) was similar among the treatment groups, with a slight increase in SAEs and SAEs involving bleeding in the 0.05 mg/kg/hr rTFPI group. The overall incidence of AEs involving bleeding was 28% of patients in the all placebo group and 23% of patients in the all rTFPI-treated group; a slight but statistically insignificant increase in incidence of SAEs involving bleeding was observed in the all rTFPI group (9%) as compared with the all placebo group (6%; p =.39).ConclusionsAlthough the trial was not powered to show efficacy, a trend toward reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality was observed in the all rTFPI group compared with all placebo. This study demonstrates that rTFPI doses of 0.025 and 0.05 mg/kg/hr could be safely administered to severe sepsis patients. Additionally, rTFPI demonstrated bioactivity, as shown by reduction in TATc complexes and interleukin-6 levels. These findings warrant further evaluation of rTFPI in an adequately powered, placebo controlled, randomized trial for the treatment of severe sepsis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.