• Shock · Dec 2013

    Observational Study

    Radial to Femoral Arterial Blood Pressure Differences in Septic Shock Patients Receiving High-Dose Norepinephrine Therapy.

    • Jong Hun Jun.
    • *Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center; †Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine; and ‡Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
    • Shock. 2013 Dec 1;40(6):527-31.

    ObjectivesThe accuracy of arterial blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is crucial in treating septic shock patients. Clinically significant differences in central to peripheral ABP could develop into sepsis during vasopressor therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between radial (peripheral) and femoral (central) ABP in septic shock patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine (NE) therapy.Methods And ResultsThis prospective observational study comparing simultaneous intra-arterial measurements of radial and femoral ABP was performed at a university-affiliated, tertiary referral center between October 2008 and March 2009. Patients with septic shock who needed continuous blood pressure monitoring and high-dose NE therapy 0.1 µg/kg per minute or greater to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg or greater were included. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Bland-Altman method for comparison of repeated measures. In total, 250 sets of systolic, mean, and diastolic femoral and radial ABP were recorded at baseline and after NE titration. Arterial blood pressure readings from the radial artery were underestimated compared with those from the femoral artery. Overall bias (mean difference between simultaneous measurements) between radial and femoral MAP was +4.9 mmHg; however, during high-dose NE therapy, the bias increased to +6.2 mmHg (95% limits of agreement: -6.0 to +18.3 mmHg). Clinically significant radial-femoral MAP differences (MAP ≥5 mmHg) occurred in up to 62.2% of patients with high-dose NE therapy.ConclusionsRadial artery pressure frequently underestimates central pressure in septic shock patients receiving high-dose NE therapy. Femoral arterial pressure monitoring may be more appropriate when high-dose NE therapy is administered.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.