• Lingyun Tian, Zhengqing Fang, Hongling Xiao, Li Li, and Yinglan Li.
• Department of Nursing, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008; School of Nursing, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230038, China.
• Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 May 1; 40 (5): 549-57.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive accuracy of the triage early warning score (TEWS) in the prognosis and emergency treatment for trauma patients admitted to the emergency department (ED).MethodsA total of 456 trauma patients (>12 years old) admitted to ED at an education and research hospital in approximately 4 months were prospectively studied. Th e TEWS was recorded in all patients. Th e primary end-point was during 28 days and the emergency responses (such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation/electrical defibrillation, mechanical ventilation) in the ED.ResultsPatients with TEWS less than or equal to 9, from 10 to 13, or greater or equal to 14 had mortality rates of 0.98%, 52.63%, or 80%, respectively. An increase in 1 point within the range of 17-point TEWS would be associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.14 for death [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.759 to 2.604]. In predicting mortality rates during 28 days, the cut-point was greater than 8, the sensitivity was 87.10% (95% CI: 70.2% to 96.4%), the specificity was 92.47% (95% CI: 89.5% to 94.8%), and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC) was 0.929 (95% CI: 0.902 to 0.951). Th e AUCROC of TEWS in predicting the emergency responses for CPR/electrical defibrillation application or mechanical ventilation was 0.969 (95% CI: 0.949 to 0.983) or 0.897 (95% CI: 0.865 to 0.923), respectively.ConclusionTEWS is effective in predicting the prognosis and emergency treatment for trauma patients admitted to ED.

17 keywords...

hide…