• Injury · Jun 2013

    Comparative Study

    Intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures: central or caudal positioning of the load carrier? A biomechanical comparative study on cadaver bones.

    • L Konstantinidis, C Papaioannou, A Hirschmüller, T Pavlidis, S Schroeter, N P Südkamp, and P Helwig.
    • Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany. lukas.konstantinidis@uniklinik-freiburg.de
    • Injury. 2013 Jun 1;44(6):784-90.

    BackgroundCurrent recommendations with regard to central or caudal positioning of the femur head carrier in the management of trochanteric fractures are contradictory.MethodsA standardised pertrochanteric osteotomy was stabilised in 15 pairs of cadaver femurs by means of intramedullary osteosynthesis (5xPFN-A-Synthes, 5xIntertan-Smith&Nephew, 5xTargon-PF-Aesculap). For each pair randomised central (group A) or caudal (group B) implantation of the femoral neck component was performed. Subsequently, the constructs were axially loaded to 2100N. In the absence of cut out after 20,000 cycles, load was increased to a maximum force of 3100N. Angular displacement was recorded based on ultrasound. Migration of the load carrier in the femoral head was monitored radiologically.Findings DisplacementNo significant difference between groups (p>0.15) was found for the first 50 load cycles. A significantly greater degree of varus deformity was observed in group A (p=0.049) after 2000 load cycles and became more apparent as the number of load cycles increased (after 6000 cycles p=0.039, after 20,000 cycles p=0.034, after 22,000 cycles p=0.016). Angular displacement in the other two planes did not differ significantly across groups. CUT OUT: Migration of the load carrier in the femoral head was not significantly different for the two groups. Overall cut out occurred in 9 constructs, 3 in group A and 6 in group B. The difference in cut-out rate was not significant (p=0.213, chi-squared test).ConclusionBiomechanical superiority can be shown for caudal positioning of the femoral neck load carrier in terms of reduced varus deformity. The incidence of cut out is however unaffected by the position of the load carrier.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…