• Jan Gessmann, Birger Jettkant, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, and Dominik Seybold.
• BG Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Department of Traumatology, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany. jangessmann@gmx.de
• Injury. 2011 Oct 1;42(10):1107-11.

BackgroundThe biomechanical effect of indirect weight loading with the Ilizarov ring fixator using a weight-bearing platform has not yet been investigated. The problem of wire loosening and breakage occurs more frequently when patients are mobilised with a weight-bearing platform. Therefore, the aim of this research was to compare the influence of direct and indirect weight loading on the tensioned wires.MethodA universal testing machine (UTS, Germany) was used in this study. A composite tibia model with a standard four-ring Ilizarov fixator and 1.8-mm wires in anatomical position was used to simulate a clinical situation. Wire strain was measured with two strain gauges positioned at the ring-wire interface of each wire. After a standardised 2-mm mid-diaphyseal osteotomy, an axial load of up to 1000 N was applied to the bone; the different methods of weight loading were evaluated in two experimental set-ups.ResultsA higher axial load was necessary to achieve an osteotomy gap closure at indirect loading. Mechanical stress on the tensioned wires was 400% higher on the proximal wires and 250% higher on the distal wires at a maximum axial loading of 1000 N. Mechanical stress remained on the wires in indirect loading, even after bone end contact, and led to excessive stress under higher weight-bearing amounts.ConclusionThere is a substantial change in the biomechanical characteristics of the Ilizarov ring fixator when mobilising a patient with a weight-bearing platform. The considerable higher mechanical stress on the wires needs to be considered when patients are mobilised with a weight-bearing platform.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…