• Br J Anaesth · May 2006

    Measuring the quality of continuous epidural block for abdominal surgery.

    • G A McLeod, K Dell, C Smith, and J A W Wildsmith.
    • University Department of Anaesthesia and Ninewells Hospital and Medical School Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. g.a.mcleod@dundee.ac.uk
    • Br J Anaesth. 2006 May 1;96(5):633-9.

    BackgroundIn view of the wide variation in pain experience between patients, a clinical standard -- the time from the end of surgery to the first experience of pain -- was applied to 1359 consecutive patients in order to investigate whether the initial quality of epidural block has an effect on the overall quality of postoperative pain relief.MethodsClinical data were recorded in 58,118 out of 72,412 h in 1359 patients, and transferred to a database. Data collected included pain scores on a four-point verbal rating scale; nausea and vomiting; motor block; sedation scores; systolic blood pressure <100 and <90 mm Hg; ventilatory frequency <10 and <8 bpm; and hourly epidural infusion rate.ResultsAs the time to first experience of pain increased from nil to >24 hours, the time from the first to last experience of pain shortened from 34 (19-50) h to 3 (1-12) h (p<0.001) and the proportion of patients receiving an epidural bolus decreased from 53 to 8% (p<0.001). Increases in the initial pain free time increased the proportion of patients with systolic BP<100 mmHg from 59 to 77%, (p<0.001) and increased the proportion of patients with respiratory rate <10 bpm from 13 to 26%, (p<0.001).ConclusionExtending pain relief for more than 12 h beyond the end of abdominal surgery significantly improves the overall quality of postoperative pain relief, but is associated with an increase in side-effects.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.