• Ann. Intern. Med. · Mar 2010

    Comparative Study

    Cardiovascular screening in college athletes with and without electrocardiography: A cross-sectional study.

    • Aaron L Baggish, Adolph M Hutter, Francis Wang, Kibar Yared, Rory B Weiner, Eli Kupperman, Michael H Picard, and Malissa J Wood.
    • Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, 02114, USA. abaggish@partners.org
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2010 Mar 2;152(5):269-75.

    BackgroundAlthough cardiovascular screening is recommended for athletes before participating in sports, the role of 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) remains uncertain. To date, no prospective data that compare screening with and without ECG have been available.ObjectiveTo compare the performance of preparticipation screening limited to medical history and physical examination with a strategy that integrates these with ECG.DesignCross-sectional comparison of screening strategies.SettingUniversity Health Services, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Participants510 collegiate athletes who received cardiovascular screening before athletic participation.MeasurementsEach participant had routine history and examination-limited screening and ECG. They received transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to detect or exclude cardiac findings with relevance to sports participation. The performance of screening with history and examination only was compared with that of screening that integrated history, examination, and ECG.ResultsCardiac abnormalities with relevance to sports participation risk were observed on TTE in 11 of 510 participants (prevalence, 2.2%). Screening with history and examination alone detected abnormalities in 5 of these 11 athletes (sensitivity, 45.5% [95% CI, 16.8% to 76.2%]; specificity, 94.4% [CI, 92.0% to 96.2%]). Electrocardiography detected 5 additional participants with cardiac abnormalities (for a total of 10 of 11 participants), thereby improving the overall sensitivity of screening to 90.9% (CI, 58.7% to 99.8%). However, including ECG reduced the specificity of screening to 82.7% (CI, 79.1% to 86.0%) and was associated with a false-positive rate of 16.9% (vs. 5.5% for screening with history and examination only).LimitationDefinitive conclusions regarding the effect of ECG inclusion on sudden death rates cannot be made.ConclusionAdding ECG to medical history and physical examination improves the overall sensitivity of preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes. However, this strategy is associated with an increased rate of false-positive results when current ECG interpretation criteria are used.Primary Funding SourceNone.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…