• Burns · Mar 2013

    Cough strength, secretions and extubation outcome in burn patients who have passed a spontaneous breathing trial.

    • Sarah T Smailes, Andrew J McVicar, and Rebecca Martin.
    • St Andrew's Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 7ET, United Kingdom. sarah.smailes@meht.nhs.uk
    • Burns. 2013 Mar 1;39(2):236-42.

    AbstractThe aim of this study was to develop a clinical prediction model to inform decisions about the timing of extubation in burn patients who have passed a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Rapid shallow breathing index, voluntary cough peak flow (CPF) and endotracheal secretions were measured after each patient had passed a SBT and just prior to extubation. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to identify variables that predict extubation outcome. Seventeen patients failed their first trials of extubation (14%). CPF and endotracheal secretions are strongly associated with extubation outcome (p<0.0001). Patients with CPF ≤60 L/min are 9 times as likely to fail extubation as those with CPF >60 L/min (risk ratio=9.1). Patients with abundant endotracheal secretions are 8 times as likely to fail extubation compared to those with no, mild and moderate endotracheal secretions (risk ratio=8). Our clinical prediction model combining CPF and endotracheal secretions has strong predictive capacity for extubation outcome (area under receiver operating characteristic curve=0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.99) and therefore may be useful to predict which patients will succeed or fail extubation after passing a SBT.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.