-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Effects of solvent/detergent-treated plasma and fresh-frozen plasma on haemostasis and fibrinolysis in complex coagulopathy following open-heart surgery.
- H Haubelt, M Blome, A H Kiessling, F Isgro, J Bach, W Saggau, and P Hellstern.
- Institute of Hemostaseology and Transfusion Medicine, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
- Vox Sang. 2002 Jan 1;82(1):9-14.
Background And ObjectivesSolvent/detergent-treated plasma (SDP) contains markedly lower protein S (PS) and plasmin inhibitor (PI) activity than standard fresh-frozen plasma (FFP). It has also been reported that SDP contains no alpha(1)-antitrypsin. Despite the lack of clinical data, it is suspected that SDP may be less effective than FFP in the treatment of complex coagulopathies. We therefore conducted a prospective trial to study the impact of SDP and FFP on haemostasis and fibrinolysis in complex coagulopathy after open-heart surgery.Materials And MethodsPatients received either 600 ml of SDP (n = 36) or 600 ml of FFP (n = 31) at an infusion rate of 30 ml/min. The following parameters were measured before treatment and 60 min after termination of plasma infusion: prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen, factor VIII, antithrombin, protein C (PC), free PS and PS activity, prothrombin fragments F1+2 (F1+2), D-dimers (DD), fibrinogen degradation products (FDP), plasmin-plasmin inhibitor complexes (PPI), plasminogen, PI and alpha(1)-antitrypsin.ResultsThe rise in fibrinogen, factor VIII, antithrombin, PC, free PS, alpha(1)-antitrypsin and plasminogen, and the decrease in PT and APTT, did not significantly differ between the two study arms. However, PS activity did not increase after SDP infusion but did show a significant elevation after infusion with FFP. PI declined significantly after SDP and remained uninfluenced by FFP. Neither SDP nor FFP had any significant influence on F1+2, DD or FDP. However, a significant decrease in PPI levels caused by both types of plasma indicated a reduction in hyperfibrinolysis. Clinical haemostasis evaluation revealed no significant difference between the two treatment regimens. No adverse reactions were observed.ConclusionWith the exception of PS and PI, SDP and FFP improved haemostasis and fibrinolysis to a similar degree. The clinical significance of these findings has to be determined in patients with severe acquired PS and PI deficiency requiring plasma transfusions.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.