• Intensive care medicine · Aug 1996

    Clinical Trial

    Weaning and extubation in the intensive care unit. Clinical or index-driven approach?

    • E A Leitch, J L Moran, and B Grealy.
    • Intensive Care Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Wodville, Australia.
    • Intensive Care Med. 1996 Aug 1;22(8):752-9.

    ObjectiveTo assess the outcome of a clinical judgement-based approach to weaning and extubation and to adduce the predictive accuracy of various mechanical respiratory indices measured in parallel.DesignProspective study.SettingMultidisciplinary intensive care unit at a university teaching hospital.Patients163 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients, excluding tracheotomy, for weaning trial and extubation.InterventionsUsing bedside clinical assessment, aided by arterial gas analysis, patients were weaned from mechanical ventilation to spontaneous ventilation via to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) circuit (with pressure support) of a microprocessor-controlled ventilator. Extubation occurred from the CPAP circuit at 7 cmH2O pressure support, fractional inspired oxygen (FIO2) < or = 0.5 and CPAP level of < or = 5 cmH2O, such that the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) was > or = 65 mmHg. Before extubation, observation for a 1-h (T0 and T60) trial period allowed measurement of vital capacity (VC), expired minute volume (VE), respiratory rate/tidal volume (f/VT) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) using a one-way valve technique over 25 s.Measurements And Main ResultsOver 7 months, 163 patients (62 females and 101 males; mean (SD) age 64(15) years) were considered. There were 91 surgical (18 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD) and 72 medical (28 with COPD) patients. Ventilation was for > or = 1 day (median 5 days, range 1-31) in 115 [group I; APACHE II score 23(8)] and < or = 1 day in 48 [Group II; APACHE II score 17(6)]. Three patients (all Group I: 2 surgical, 1 medical) were reintubated within 24 h, an overall extubation failure rate of 1.8%. In group I, at T0, PaO2/FIO2 was 238(65), f/VT 50(26), MIP 44(21) cmH2O, VE 10.6(3.7) l/min, VC 13(5) ml/kg. Cardiorespiratory variables did not change significantly in either group, T0 to T60. For prediction of reintubation (n = 163), only VE (threshold > 10 l/min) and f/VT (threshold > 100) demonstrated moderate sensitivity and specificity at T60: 67 and 52% and 33 and 94%, respectively.ConclusionsBedside clinical judgement of weaning and extubation produces satisfactory outcomes. As a routine, mechanical predictive indices have limited utility.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…