• J Emerg Med · Feb 2013

    Multicenter Study

    No diversion in Western Massachusetts.

    • Niels K Rathlev, Fidela Blank, Ben Osborne, Adam Kellogg, Haiping Li, Jacques Blanchet, Ray F Conway, Louis Durkin, Rick Gerstein, Stan Strzempko, Manish Vig, John P Santoro, and Paul Visintainer.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Baystate Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
    • J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb 1;44(2):313-20.

    BackgroundMassachusetts (MA) instituted a moratorium on ambulance diversion ("No Diversion") on January 1, 2009.Study ObjectivesDetermine whether No Diversion was associated with changes in Emergency Department (ED) throughput measures.DesignComparison of three 3-month periods. Period 1: 1 year prior (January-March 2008); Period 2: 3 months prior (October-December 2008); Period 3: 3 months after (January-March 2009).SettingSeven EDs in Western MA; two - including the only Level I Trauma Center - were "high" diversion (≥562 h/year) and 5 were "low" diversion (≤260 h/year). For "all," "high" diversion and "low" diversion ED groups, we compared mean monthly throughput measures, including: 1) total volume, 2) number of admissions, 3) number of elopements, 4) length of stay for all, admitted and discharged patients. Mean absolute and percent changes were estimated using mixed-effects regression analysis. Linear mixed models were run for "all," "high" and "low" diversion EDs comparing means of changes between periods. Results are presented as mean change per month in number and percent, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We specified that a clinically significant effect of No Diversion had to meet two criteria: 1) there was a consistent difference in the means for both the Period 1 vs. Period 3 comparison and the Period 2 vs. Period 3 comparison, and 2) both comparisons had to achieve statistical significance at p ≤ 0.01.ResultsAccording to pre-determined criteria, no clinically significant changes were found in any ED group in mean monthly volume, admissions, elopements, or length-of-stay for any patient disposition group.ConclusionNo Diversion was not associated with significant changes in throughput measures in "all," "high" diversion and "low" diversion EDs.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.