• Ann Vasc Surg · Oct 2014

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under cervical block and general anesthesia.

    • Marika Gassner, Zachary Bauman, Sheila Parish, Cory Koenig, Jose Martin, and Sachinder Hans.
    • Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Clinton Township, MI. Electronic address: mgassne1@hfhs.org.
    • Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct 1;28(7):1680-5.

    BackgroundThe objective of this study was to assess differences in hemodynamic stability for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under general anesthesia (GA) as compared with cervical block anesthesia (CBA).MethodsAn institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of 651 patients from 1998 to 2012 undergoing CEA was performed: 254 patients underwent CEA under CBA and 397 under GA. Comprehensive chart review including preoperative, postoperative, and 30-day follow-up was conducted. Patients were monitored continuously intraoperatively and for 24 hr after surgery. All intraoperative vasoactive and antihypertensive medications administered were recorded.ResultsBoth groups were similar in age, incidence of coronary artery disease, hypertension, and renal failure. There was a preponderance of female patients, with a high incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and nicotine abuse in the GA group. Symptomatic patients predominated the GA group (54% vs. 41%; P = 0.0018). Of the symptomatic patients, 78% experienced transient ischemic attacks in the GA group vs. 64% in the CBA group. Evaluation of hemodynamic stability under GA versus CBA revealed that no significant hemodynamic changes occurred in 34.5% of CBA patients vs. only 14.4% in the GA group. Under GA, incidence of hypotension was 17.84% as compared with 0.52% under CBA (P < 0.001). Under GA, patients had far more hemodynamic fluctuations with 41% of patients demonstrating >3 intraoperative fluctuations in mean arterial pressure of >20% vs. 20% in the CBA group (P < 0.001). Under GA, 51% of patients required vasopressors alone vs. 36% under CBA (P < 0.0002). Antihypertensive medications alone were required in 63% of patients in the GA group vs. 73% in the CBA group (P = 0.0085). Thirty percent of all patients required both vasopressors and antihypertensives during surgery; 23% under CBA vs. 34% under GA (P = 0.0457). There were two postoperative hematoma's CBA cohort. The GA cohort developed postoperative complications (myocardial infarction, 4; stroke, 6; and hematoma, 9), however, these complications were not statistically significant compared with the CBA group.ConclusionsFor patients undergoing CEA, CBA resulted in less hemodynamic fluctuations and fewer intraoperative vasoactive medication requirements as compared with GA.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.