-
Arch Cardiovasc Dis · Mar 2009
Comparative StudyClinical presentation and outcome of patients hospitalized for symptomatic in-stent restenosis treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison between drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents.
- Axel De Labriolle, Laurent Bonello, Gilles Lemesle, Daniel H Steinberg, Probal Roy, Zhenyi Xue, Kimberly Kaneshige, William O Suddath, Lowell F Satler, Kenneth M Kent, Augusto D Pichard, Joseph Lindsay, and Ron Waksman.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, 110, Irving Street, NW, Suite 4B-1, Washington DC 20010, USA.
- Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Mar 1;102(3):209-17.
BackgroundIn-stent restenosis remains the major limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), particularly after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation. Drug-eluting stents (DES) decrease in-stent restenosis, which is thought to have minimal clinical consequences, but may increase the risk of stent thrombosis and its attendant high mortality rate.AimsTo assess the clinical consequences of in-stent restenosis, including severity of associated illness and acute and 1-year outcomes and to compare DES and BMS in-stent restenosis.MethodsUsing our prospective PCI registry, we compared data from 1958 consecutive patients hospitalized with BMS in-stent restenosis between January 2000 and April 2003 and all 190 patients with DES in-stent restenosis admitted between April 2003 and September 2006. Risk-adjusted outcomes were calculated using propensity-score matching.ResultsAn unstable presentation was noted in 78.1% of 2148 patients. Patients with DES in-stent restenosis presented more often with acute myocardial infarction (4.3% versus 1.6%, p<0.001). At 1 year, mortality for all patients was 5.7% and target-vessel revascularization was 21.5%. After risk adjustment, target-vessel revascularization and target-vessel revascularization-major adverse cardiac events were greater in patients with DES in-stent restenosis (respectively, 27.8% versus 19.7%, p=0.05; 32.5% versus 24.3%, p=0.06).ConclusionIn-stent restenosis is associated with unstable presentation and a higher 1-year adverse events rate than expected in patients undergoing elective PCI. For an identical level of cardiac risk, it seems that DES in-stent restenosis outcomes are slightly worse than BMS in-stent restenosis outcomes.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..