• Ralph O Suarez, Vahid Taimouri, Katrina Boyer, Clemente Vega, Alexander Rotenberg, Joseph R Madsen, Tobias Loddenkemper, Frank H Duffy, Sanjay P Prabhu, and Simon K Warfield.
• Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Ralph.Suarez@childrens.harvard.edu.
• Epilepsy Res. 2014 Dec 1;108(10):1874-88.

AbstractIn this study we validate passive language fMRI protocols designed for clinical application in pediatric epilepsy surgical planning as they do not require overt participation from patients. We introduced a set of quality checks that assess reliability of noninvasive fMRI mappings utilized for clinical purposes. We initially compared two fMRI language mapping paradigms, one active in nature (requiring participation from the patient) and the other passive in nature (requiring no participation from the patient). Group-level analysis in a healthy control cohort demonstrated similar activation of the putative language centers of the brain in the inferior frontal (IFG) and temporoparietal (TPG) regions. Additionally, we showed that passive language fMRI produced more left-lateralized activation in TPG (LI=+0.45) compared to the active task; with similarly robust left-lateralized IFG (LI=+0.24) activations using the passive task. We validated our recommended fMRI mapping protocols in a cohort of 15 pediatric epilepsy patients by direct comparison against the invasive clinical gold-standards. We found that language-specific TPG activation by fMRI agreed to within 9.2mm to subdural localizations by invasive functional mapping in the same patients, and language dominance by fMRI agreed with Wada test results at 80% congruency in TPG and 73% congruency in IFG. Lastly, we tested the recommended passive language fMRI protocols in a cohort of very young patients and confirmed reliable language-specific activation patterns in that challenging cohort. We concluded that language activation maps can be reliably achieved using the passive language fMRI protocols we proposed even in very young (average 7.5 years old) or sedated pediatric epilepsy patients.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

31 keywords...

hide…