• J W Serpell and M E Pitcher.
• Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology and General Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
• Aust N Z J Surg. 1998 May 1;68(5):345-9.

BackgroundSoft-tissue sarcomas are rare, and clinical differentiation of benign tumours from sarcomas is sometimes impossible. Further, the diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcomas may be unsuspected pre-operatively, and the presenting mass enucleated. While enucleation (excisional biopsy) is acceptable for benign lesions, it is inappropriate for sarcomas, because the opportunity for the most effective management resulting in both adequate local control and functional limb salvage surgery is compromised. A high rate of wound complications following open incisional biopsy may also compromise local treatment. Inappropriate siting of the incision for both incisional and excisional biopsies may adversely affect subsequent surgery and radiotherapy.MethodsWe therefore assessed the accuracy of core biopsy in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumours, and planning of definitive surgery. All patients with primary soft-tissue tumours managed by two surgeons with a special interest in soft-tissue sarcomas since 1991 were reviewed. More than half (53%) were referred from other specialists.ResultsOf 45 cases, 37 (82%) were referred with the tumour intact, and of these 31 (84%) underwent core biopsy. The overall accuracy of core biopsy was 84%. The sensitivity was 94%, with 100% specificity. In most patients this allowed planning of definitive one-stage surgery (P < 0.005). Of the remaining five non-diagnostic cores, four were benign and one was a non-specific malignancy.ConclusionsCore biopsy has a high degree of accuracy in the diagnosis of soft-tissue tumours, particularly malignant lesions, and is not misleading. Core biopsy avoids the complications of open biopsy, and enables planning of one-stage surgery when used in combination with appropriate imaging.

23 keywords...

hide…