• Ichiro Takenaka, Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Tamao Iwagaki, Hiroshi Ishimura, and Tatsuo Kadoya.
• Department of Anesthesia, Nippon Steel Yawata Memorial Hospital, 1-1-1 Harunomachi, Yahatahigashi-ku, Kitakyushu 805-8508, Japan. takenaka.i@ns.yawata-mhp.or.jp
• Can J Anaesth. 2007 Feb 1;54(2):129-33.

PurposeWhile the anatomic sniffing position has traditionally been considered the standard head and neck position for laryngoscopy, recent evidence suggests that the sniffing position provides no significant advantage over simple head extension. To establish if the sniffing position provides an anatomic advantage, we compared the occipito-atlanto-axial extension angle, a key determinant for obtaining a good laryngeal view during laryngoscopy, in simple head extension and sniffing positions.MethodsThirty volunteers with normal cervical spines were studied. Radiological examinations of the lateral cervical spine were taken and compared in each of the following three positions for each subject: neutral position (flat on the table with no pillow and without head extension or flexion); simple head extension (head maximally extended without a pillow); and the sniffing position (head extension with cervical flexion obtained by 7 cm occipital elevation).ResultsMean angles of the occipito-atlanto-axial extension in simple head extension and the sniffing position were 20.4 degrees+/-5.1 degrees and 24.2 degrees+/-5.6 degrees, respectively (P<0.01).ConclusionThe anatomic sniffing position provides greater occipito-atlanto-axial extension compared to simple head extension. These findings should be taken into consideration when optimizing patient positioning for laryngoscopy.

19 keywords...

hide…