• Pediatrics · Jan 2002

    Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial

    Heliox therapy in infants with acute bronchiolitis.

    • Federico Martinón-Torres, Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez, and Jose María Martinón-Sánchez.
    • Department of Pediatrics, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. fedemartinon@hotmail.com
    • Pediatrics. 2002 Jan 1;109(1):68-73.

    ObjectiveTo assess the therapeutic effects of breathing a low-density gas mixture (heliox: 70% helium and 30% oxygen) in infants with bronchiolitis.DesignProspective, interventional, comparative study.SettingA pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a tertiary care, teaching hospital.PatientsThirty-eight infants, 1 month to 2 years old, consecutively admitted to the PICU for treatment of moderate-to-severe acute respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis.InterventionsThe first 19 patients were enrolled as the control group and received supportive care and nebulized epinephrine. In the next 19 patients, heliox therapy was added through a nonrebreather reservoir face mask. Measurements and Outcomes. Respiratory distress score, respiratory rate, heart rate, end-tidal CO(2) (etCO(2)), and pulse oximetry oxygen saturation (satO(2)) values were recorded at baseline and at regular intervals. Data obtained during the first 4 hours were analyzed for comparison purposes. Demographic data, age, time elapsed from the start of the symptoms to the admission to PICU, length of stay in PICU (PICU-LOS), and duration of heliox therapy were also collected for each patient. Reductions in clinical scores and PICU-LOS were considered primary outcomes. Main Results. At baseline, the heliox and control groups had similar age (5.5 +/- 3.1 vs 5.9 +/- 3 months), previous length of course (47.3 +/- 19.3 vs 45.4 +/- 18.6 hours), clinical score (6.7 +/- 1.1 vs 6.6 +/- 1), heart rate (160 +/- 24 vs 165 +/- 20 beats per minute), respiratory rate (64 +/- 7 vs 61 +/- 7 respirations per minute), satO(2) (91 +/- 2.3 vs 91 +/- 2.5%), and etCO(2) (34 +/- 7 vs 33 +/- 6 mm Hg). Clinical score, heart rate, respiratory rate, and satO(2) improved during the study in both groups. After 1 hour, the improvement in clinical score was significantly higher in the heliox group than in the control group (3.6 +/- 1.16 vs 5.5 +/- 0.89), and these differences continued to be significant at the end of the observation period (2.39 +/- 0.69 and 4.07 +/- 0.96, respectively), with a total average decrease in the score of 4.2 points in the heliox group versus 2.5 points in the control group. Heart and respiratory rates were also significantly lower in the heliox group compared with the control group after 1 hour and stayed lower throughout the rest of the study period. No changes were noted either in satO(2) between groups or in etCO(2) within or between groups throughout the study. Mean duration of heliox administration was 53 +/- 24 hours (range: 24-112 hours) and no adverse effects were detected. PICU-LOS was significantly shorter in the heliox group (3.5 +/- 1.1 days) than in the control group (5.4 +/- 1.6 days).ConclusionsIn infants with moderate-to-severe respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis, heliox therapy enhanced their clinical respiratory status, according to the marked improvement in their clinical scores and the reduction of the accompanying tachycardia and tachypnea. This beneficial response occurred within the first hour of its administration and was maintained as long as heliox therapy continued. In addition, PICU-LOS was reduced in heliox-treated patients. Long-term prospective studies are required to corroborate these findings and to establish the proper place of heliox in the therapeutic schedule of bronchiolitis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.