• Der Unfallchirurg · Oct 2013

    Comparative Study

    [Comparison of MRI and CT for assessment of childhood fractures : Studies on a porcine model.]

    • J D Moritz, B Hoffmann, D Sehr, A Caliebe, G Groth, M Heller, and H Bolte.
    • Klinik für Diagnostische Radiologie, Pädiatrische Radiologie und Sonographie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus 9, 24105, Kiel, Deutschland, joerg.d.moritz@rad.uni-kiel.de.
    • Unfallchirurg. 2013 Oct 1; 116 (10): 916-22.

    BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the capacity of MRI to achieve a diagnostic accuracy in pediatric fracture diagnosis comparable to CT.Material And MethodsIn an ex vivo study design, simulating pediatric skeletal trauma, 248 limb bones of 9 dead young pigs with intact soft tissue were fractured. The samples were examined in a 1.5 T MRI with T1-weighted SE sequences. A standard scanning protocol was chosen for 64 multislice CT. CT results served as the reference standard.ResultsA total of 168 fractures were found. Seven fractures were missed by MRI, whereas another six ones were detected solely by MRI. The fracture type was the same in 137, partially the same in 12, and different in 6 cases. The dislocation was the same in 137, partially the same in 13, and different in 5 fractures. All differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionMRI has a diagnostic accuracy in fracture diagnosis comparable to CT. Therefore, protocols of traumatology in infancy should be revised.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.