• F L Counselman, R W Schafermeyer, R Garcia, and D G Perina.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School and Emergency Physicians of Tidewater, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA. fcounsel@pilot.infi.net
• Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Nov 1;36(5):446-50.

Study ObjectiveTo survey academic departments of emergency medicine concerning their operation and clinical practice.MethodsA survey was mailed to the chairs of all 56 academic departments of emergency medicine in the United States requesting information concerning operations and clinical activity in budget year 1997-1998 compared with 1995-1996. These results were then compared with a similar survey conducted in the fall of 1996, examining the 1995-1996 academic year compared with the 1994-1995 academic year.ResultsForty-one (73%) academic departments of emergency medicine responded. For 1997-1998, compared with 1995-1996, 24 (59%) academic departments of emergency medicine reported an increase in emergency department patient volume; 10 (24%) reported a decrease. Twenty-four (51%) academic departments of emergency medicine reported an increase in ED patient severity, whereas 7 (15%) reported a decrease. Twenty-five (61%) academic departments of emergency medicine reported an increase in net clinical revenue for emergency medicine services, and 9 (22%) reported a decrease. Only 9 (22%) academic departments of emergency medicine reported other academic departments within their university/medical center aggressively directing patients away from the ED compared with 14 (30%) in the previous study. The percentage of academic departments of emergency medicine using midlevel providers remained essentially the same over time (68% versus 66%). In both studies, midlevel providers were used most commonly in a fast-track setting. Only 37% of academic departments of emergency medicine reported having an observation unit; staffing in all cases was by emergency physicians. Since the last survey, 38 (93%) academic departments of emergency medicine reported their medical center or hospital negotiating with managed care organizations to provide services. Unfortunately, only 41% of chairs were involved in these discussions. Between January 1, 1997, and the 1998 fall survey, 29% of academic departments of emergency medicine reported their university merging with another university system, and 19% reported such mergers being discussed. Similarly, between January 1, 1997, and fall 1998, 22% of academic departments of emergency medicine reported their institution merging with a private entity, whereas 16% reported ongoing discussions.ConclusionAcademic departments of emergency medicine have experienced some encouraging trends: an increase in ED patient volume, patient severity, and net clinical revenue during the study period. Midlevel providers continue to be used primarily in fast-track areas of EDs. An area of potential growth for academic departments of emergency medicine is observation medicine, because only one third of academic departments of emergency medicine have such a unit. Academic medical centers have experienced a significant increase in merger activity during the study period.

14 keywords...

hide…