• H Tanaka, A Iwai, J Oda, Y Kuwagata, T Matsuoka, T Shimazu, and T Yoshioka.
• The Department of Traumatology, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.
• J Emerg Med. 1998 May 1;16(3):439-44.

AbstractWe investigated how patients were evacuated and transported from affected hospitals in the disaster area to backup hospitals following the 1995 catastrophic Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. A retrospective review was conducted of medical records of 6107 patients hospitalized during the first 15 days after the earthquake, collected from 48 affected hospitals in the disaster area and 47 backup hospitals in the surrounding area. Of the 6107 patients, a total of 2290 (38%) were transferred to backup hospitals, consisting of 187 patients (50%) with crush syndrome, 702 (26%) with other traumas, and 1401 (41%) with illness. Of those 2290 patients, 1741 (76%) were transferred from affected hospitals to backup hospitals, while 549 patients (24%) were evacuated directly to backup hospitals. The peak in transport came during the first 4 days. The family car was the most frequently used means of transport; ambulance was used in only 26% of cases, and helicopters were used minimally. There was no notable difference in the percentage of intensive care patients and nonintensive care patients transferred to backup hospitals. The mortality rate for patients with trauma and crush syndrome was significantly higher in the affected hospitals. These results suggest that the existing emergency medical service system was not adequate for this urban earthquake. From our vantage point, we are keenly aware of the need for improved communications between hospitals, a well equipped patient transport system, and a well coordinated disaster response mechanism.

22 keywords...

hide…