• Belinda J Gabbe, Peter A Cameron, Rory Wolfe, Pam Simpson, Karen L Smith, and John J McNeil.
• Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. belinda.gabbe@med.monash.edu.au
• J Trauma. 2005 Aug 1; 59 (2): 458-65.

BackgroundThe success of a trauma system relies on transfer of patients from the field to the most appropriate hospital for definitive care. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the best criteria or triage tool for identifying patients injured seriously enough to warrant transfer to a trauma center.MethodsPredictors of mortality and intensive care unit stay were identified and prediction models developed in a design data set. The performance of these models was evaluated in a test data set and compared with current trauma triage guidelines, derived from the American College of Surgeons model.ResultsThe newly developed prediction models performed comparably with the current trauma triage guidelines.ConclusionAlthough the performance of newly developed triage models was promising, their performance did not exceed that of the current trauma triage guidelines. In particular, the anatomic injury criteria appeared to be the key component of the current trauma triage guidelines.

22 keywords...

hide…