• Elizabeth Johnston Taylor, Brian Ensor, and James Stanley.
• Mary Potter Hospice, Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand. beth.taylor@marypotter.org.nz
• Palliat Med. 2012 Jun 1;26(4):342-9.

BackgroundBecause socioeconomic and cultural factors contribute to where one dies, it is important to document place of death determinants in diverse societies.AimThe purpose of this study was to describe where persons in an Aotearoa New Zealand hospice die, and to identify factors that are associated with place of death.DesignA retrospective chart review was conducted.Setting/ParticipantsData were extracted from the charts of all patients receiving services from one hospice (i.e. secondary care) for whom death occurred during 2006-2008; 1268 cases for whom place of death was recorded comprise this sample.ResultsFor close to half (47%), death occurred in the hospice inpatient unit, whereas 29% died at home, 8% died in an acute hospital setting, and 17% died in an aged/residential care facility. Bivariate analyses showed that persons who die in an aged/residential care facility are more likely to be aged 65 or older, unmarried, have a non-cancer diagnosis, and are likely poorer. Asians, those aged less than 65, those with cancer, and those admitted initially to hospice for respite care tended to die in the hospice inpatient unit. Multinominal logistic regression indicated that dying at home was only predicted by being from a Pacific Island.ConclusionsAge, economics, diagnosis, ethnicity, marital status, and whether one enters a hospice service for (at least in part) respite were all associated to a certain extent with where one dies. These findings contribute to the growing evidence linking various factors, especially ethnic groups, with place of death.

26 keywords...

hide…