• Mona Nabulsi, Hala Tamim, Ramzi Sabra, Ziyad Mahfoud, Shadi Malaeb, Hadi Fakih, and Mohammad Mikati.
• Department of Pediatrics, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. mn04@aub.edu.lb
• Bmc Pediatr. 2005 Jan 1;5:35.

BackgroundThe antipyretic effectiveness of rectal versus oral acetaminophen is not well established. This study is designed to compare the antipyretic effectiveness of two rectal acetaminophen doses (15 mg/kg) and (35 mg/kg), to the standard oral dose of 15 mg/kg.MethodsThis is a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind study of 51 febrile children, receiving one of three regimens of a single acetaminophen dose: 15 mg/kg orally, 15 mg/kg rectally, or 35 mg/kg rectally. Rectal temperature was monitored at baseline and hourly for a total of six hours. The primary outcome of the study, time to maximum antipyresis, and the secondary outcome of time to temperature reduction by at least 1 degrees C were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures over time was used to compare the secondary outcome: change in temperature from baseline at times 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours among the three groups. Intent-to-treat analysis was planned.ResultsNo significant differences were found among the three groups in the time to maximum antipyresis (overall mean = 3.6 hours; 95% CI: 3.2-4.0), time to fever reduction by 1 degrees C or the mean hourly temperature from baseline to 6 hours following dose administration. Hypothermia (temperature < 36.5 degrees C) occurred in 11(21.6%) subjects, with the highest proportion being in the rectal high-dose group.ConclusionStandard (15 mg/kg) oral, (15 mg/kg) rectal, and high-dose (35 mg/kg) rectal acetaminophen have similar antipyretic effectiveness.

24 keywords...

hide…