• Abdullah M Al Shehri, Mohamed R El-Tahan, Roshdi Al Metwally, Hatem Qutub, Yasser F El Ghoneimy, Mohamed A Regal, and Haytham Zien.
• Department of Cardiology, King Fahd Hospital of the University of Dammam, Al Khubar, Saudi Arabia.
• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2014 Aug 1;28(4):880-4.

ObjectivesTo test the effects of pressure-controlled (PCV) and volume-controlled (VCV) ventilation during one-lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracic surgery on right ventricular (RV) function.DesignA prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover study.SettingA single university hospital.ParticipantsFourteen pairs of consecutive patients scheduled for elective thoracotomy.InterventionsPatients were assigned randomly to ventilate the dependent lung with PCV or VCV mode, each in a randomized crossover order using tidal volume of 6 mL/kg, I: E ratio 1: 2.5, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O and respiratory rate adjusted to maintain normocapnia.Measurements And Main ResultsIntraoperative changes in RV function (systolic and early diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV), end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV) and fractional area changes (FAC)), airway pressures, compliance and oxygenation index were recorded. The use of PCV during OLV resulted in faster systolic (10.1±2.39 vs. 5.8±1.67 cm/s, respectively), diastolic TAV (9.2±1.99 vs. 4.6±1.42 cm/s, respectively) (p<0.001) and compliance and lower ESV, EDV and airway pressures (p<0.05) than during the use of VCV. Oxygenation indices were similar during the use of VCV and PCV.ConclusionsThe use of PCV offers more improved RV function than the use of VCV during OLV for open thoracotomy. These results apply specifically to younger patients with good ventricular and pulmonary functions.© 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…