• Pieternella E Graveland, André I Wierdsma, Walter W van den Broek, and Tom K Birkenhäger.
• Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
• Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2013 Aug 1;45:230-5.

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of propofol and etomidate on the stimulus variables and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in depressed inpatients.MethodThis retrospective study included 54 inpatients (aged 18-75 years) who met the DSM-IV criteria for major depression and were treated with bilateral ECT. For the first part of the study, the primary outcome was the mean stimulus charge per ECT session. For the second part, the main outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving full remission.ResultsPropofol-treated patients showed a higher mean stimulus charge (etomidate = 227.58 ± 130.44, propofol = 544.91 ± 237.56, p<0.001) despite the lack of a significant difference in starting threshold doses. The propofol group had shorter mean electroencephalogram (etomidate = 69.41 ± 22.50, propofol = 42.95 ± 22.26, p<0.001) seizure duration and motor (etomidate = 46.11 ± 14.38, propofol = 22.89 ± 7.13, p<0.001) seizure duration and a higher mean number of inadequate seizures (etomidate = 0.12 ± 0.15, propofol = 0.47 ± 0.26, p<0.001). No significant differences were found between the groups for the effects of the anesthetics on the efficacy of ECT.LimitationsOur study is limited by a retrospective design and the small number of patients treated with propofol restricted the sample size.ConclusionsAnesthesia with propofol has a significant reducing effect on seizure duration during the course of ECT which results in more inadequate seizures, despite the use of a higher mean stimulus charge. Regarding the possible effect of the anesthetics on ECT, randomized clinical trials with sufficient power to detect differences are warranted.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

46 keywords...

hide…