• Circulation · Nov 1994

    Comparative Study

    Pulsatility improves hemodynamics during fetal bypass. Experimental comparative study of pulsatile versus steady flow.

    • G Champsaur, P Parisot, S Martinot, J Ninet, J Robin, M Ovize, P Brulé, J Neidecker, and M Franck.
    • Hôpital Cardiologique, Lyon, France.
    • Circulation. 1994 Nov 1;90(5 Pt 2):II47-50.

    BackgroundThe main advantage of pulsatile flow compared with steady flow during cardiopulmonary bypass is to prevent a rise in systemic vascular resistances. We hypothesized that pulsatile flow could overcome the progressive rise in peripheral and placental vascular resistances observed during fetal bypass and leading to progressive irreversible hypoxemia.Methods And ResultsA study was undertaken in 17 fetal lambs (110 to 140 days of gestation). Fetal bypass was established for a 30-minute period through right atrial and main pulmonary artery cannulation. The circuit had no oxygenator. Flow was delivered by a standard roller pump for the continuous study (group 1, n = 9) or by a centrifugal pulsatile pump for the pulsatile study (group 2, n = 8). Oxymetric and hemodynamic parameters, along with organ blood flow determined by radiolabeled microspheres counting, were recorded before (T1) and after 10 minutes (T2) and 30 minutes (T3) of bypass. SaO2 and PaO2 were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 at T2 but thereafter deteriorated similarly in both groups, whereas PCO2 remained unchanged. Pump flow in group 2 was significantly higher than in group 1 at T2 and T3 (957.6 +/- 49 and 1104 +/- 152 versus 437.6 +/- 23 and 467.8 +/- 43 mL/min, respectively). Systemic vascular resistances during pulsatile bypass were also significantly lower than in group 1 at T2 (402 +/- 12 versus 930 +/- 79 dynes/sec/cm-5) and T3 (374 +/- 60 versus 1017 +/- 192 dynes/sec/cm-5). At T2 and T3, all individual blood flows except the brain but including the placenta were statistically higher in group 2 than in group 1. Placental vascular resistances gradually increased during bypass in group 1 to reach 2.9 +/- 0.2 mm Hg.mL-1.min-1.kg-1 at T3 and remained approximately stable in group 2 during 30 minutes of pulsatile bypass, varying from 0.35 +/- 0.02 to 1.26 +/- 0.14 from T2 to T3 (P < .01).ConclusionsThe data suggest that pulsatile flow for 30 minutes of bypass in a fetal lamb preparation temporarily prevents the progressive hypoxemia observed under steady-flow bypass. Pulsatile flow allows higher pump flow through a significant decrease in systemic vascular resistances. Individual organ blood flow, including placenta, was significantly higher under pulsatile bypass. With technical improvements in the design of pulsatile devices adapted to more physiological beat rates, pulsatility may become a valuable adjunct to overcome placental dysfunction observed during experimental fetal cardiac surgery.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.