• G S Voyagis, V K Dimitriou, and K P Kyriakis.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Gennimatas Hospitals, Athens, Greece.
• Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 Jun 1;16(6):371-5.

AbstractThe cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) was compared with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with respect to airway quality and respiratory adverse events in 140 spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedures of duration more than 1 h. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either a COPA (n = 72) or a LMA (n = 68) for airway management during anaesthesia induced with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide and oxygen. Groups were similar when comparing the first-time successful insertion rates (COPA: 94.5%, LMA: 95.6%), but airway manipulations (head tilt, chin lift, jaw thrust) were reported more frequently in the COPA group, 27.8% vs. LMA, 4.4%; P = 0.0005. During the post-induction apnoeic period, all patients were ventilated manually and although, mean (SD) leak pressure was lower in the COPA group (18 (4) cm H2O vs. LMA, 22 (3) cm H2O; P < 0.0001), the tidal volumes achieved did not differ in both groups: COPA, 9.5 (4) mL kg-1 vs. LMA, 10.5 (4.5) mL kg-1. The incidences of intra-operative coughing, gagging, laryngospasm, oxygen desaturation and hypercarbia were similar in both groups. Although both devices are equivalent with respect to the overall respiratory problems during spontaneous breathing anaesthesia of intermediate or prolonged duration, the LMA was associated with fewer airway quality problems, suggesting that it is more efficacious in securing the airway.

20 keywords...

hide…