• J-H Baumert, K E Hecker, M Hein, S M Reyle-Hahn, N A Horn, and R Rossaint.
• Klinik fuer Anaesthesiologie, Universitaetsklinikum Aaachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany. jbaumert@ukaachen.de
• Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jun 1;94(6):727-32.

BackgroundIt was hypothesized that xenon would stabilize mean arterial pressure (MAP) in haemorrhagic shock, recovery, and volume resuscitation, because a higher MAP has been observed with xenon, when compared with isoflurane anaesthesia. The responses to haemorrhage and subsequent volume replacement were therefore compared between xenon and isoflurane anaesthesia, in pigs.MethodsPigs were randomized to anaesthesia with xenon 0.55 MAC (group Xe, n=9) or isoflurane 0.55 MAC (group Iso, n=9), each with remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1). MAP, heart rate, cardiac output (CO), and left ventricular fractional area change (FAC) were collected at control (1), after haemorrhage (20 ml kg(-1)) (2), after 10 min of recovery (3), after volume replacement (4), and 30 min later (5). Data were analysed by two-way repeated measures anova.ResultsBlood loss decreased MAP (Xe: 103 [21] to 53 [24] mm Hg; Iso: 92 [18] to 55 [14] mm Hg) and CO (Xe: 4.1 [0.8] to 2.6 [0.5] litre min(-1); Iso: 5.1 [1.1] to 3.8 [1.2] litre min(-1)), in spite of significant tachycardia. MAP and CO recovered to about 75% of control, and subsequent volume replacement completely reversed symptoms in both groups, but increased FAC only with xenon.ConclusionHaemodynamic response to acute haemorrhage appeared faster with xenon/remifentanil than with isoflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia. In particular MAP decrease and short-term recovery were more marked with xenon (P<0.02). In the xenon group, volume replacement increased FAC compared with control and isoflurane (P<0.02).

20 keywords...

hide…