• Critical care medicine · Aug 2014

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Guideline Bundles Adherence and Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.

    • Arthur R H van Zanten, Sylvia Brinkman, M Sesmu Arbous, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Mitchell M Levy, Nicolette F de Keizer, and Netherlands Patient Safety Agency Sepsis Expert Group.
    • 1Department of Intensive Care, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands. 2Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) Foundation, The Netherlands. 4Department of Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 5Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
    • Crit. Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;42(8):1890-8.

    ObjectiveSurviving Sepsis Campaign bundles have been associated with reduced mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Case-mix adjusted mortality evaluations have not been performed to compare hospitals participating in sepsis bundle programs with those not participating. We aimed to achieve an individual bundle target adherence more than 80% and a relative mortality reduction of at least 15% (absolute mortality reduction 5.2%) at the end of 2012.DesignProspective multicenter cohort study in participating and nonparticipating centers.SettingEighty-two ICUs in The Netherlands.PatientsIn total, 213,677 adult ICU patients admitted to all ICUs among which 8,387 severe sepsis patients at 52 participating ICUs and 8,031 severe sepsis patients at 30 nonparticipating ICUs.InterventionsA national program to screen patients for severe sepsis and septic shock and implement Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles to complete within 6 and 24 hours after ICU admission.Measurements And Main ResultsBundle target adherence and case-mix adjusted in-hospital mortality were evaluated through odds ratios of time since program initiation by logistic generalized estimating equation analyses (July 2009 through January 2013). Outcomes were adjusted for age, gender, admission type, severity of illness, and sepsis diagnosis location. Participation duration was associated with improved bundle target adherence (adjusted odds ratio per month = 1.024 [1.016-1.031]) and decreased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio per month = 0.992 [0.986-0.997]) equivalent to 5.8% adjusted absolute mortality reduction over 3.5 years. Mortality reduced in screened patients with other diagnoses (1.9% over 3.5 yr, adjusted odds ratio per month = 0.995 [0.9906-0.9996]) and did not change in nonscreened patients in participating ICUs, nor in patients with sepsis or other diagnoses in nonparticipating ICUs.ConclusionsImplementation of a national sepsis program resulted in improved adherence to sepsis bundles in severe sepsis and septic shock patients and was associated with reduced adjusted in-hospital mortality only in participating ICUs, suggesting direct impact of sepsis screening and bundle application on in-hospital mortality.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…