-
Critical care medicine · Jun 2008
Tracheostomy protocol: experience with development and potential utility.
- Bradley D Freeman, Carie Kennedy, T Elizabeth Robertson, Craig M Coopersmith, Marilyn Schallom, Carrie Sona, Lisa Cracchiolo, Douglas J E Schuerer, Walter A Boyle, and Timothy G Buchman.
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. freemanb@wustl.edu
- Crit. Care Med. 2008 Jun 1;36(6):1742-8.
ObjectivesTo examine the feasibility and potential utility of a tracheostomy protocol based on a standardized approach to ventilator weaning.DesignProspective, observational data collection.SettingAcademic medical center.PatientsSurgical intensive care unit patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsTracheostomy practice in 200 patients was analyzed in relation to spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) weaning. Decision for, and performance of, tracheostomy occurred (median [interquartile range]) 5.0 (3.75-8.0) and 7.0 (5.0-10.0) days following initiation of mechanical ventilation, respectively. Duration of mechanical ventilation was greater in tracheostomy compared with nontracheostomy patients (15.0 [11.0-19.0] vs. 6.0 [4.0-8.0], p < .001). For patients requiring ventilatory support for > or = 20 days, 100% of patients were maintained via tracheostomy. A protocol based on weaning performance, which included technical considerations, was developed. Individuals who failed preliminary weaning assessment or SBT for 3 successive days following 5 days (nonreintubated patients) or 3 days (reintubated patients) of ventilatory support met tracheostomy criteria. The protocol was implemented on a pilot basis in 125 individuals. Of the 55 (44.0%) patients undergoing tracheostomy, 25 (45.5%) did so consistent with criteria. Eighteen patients (32.7%) underwent tracheostomy before the time interval of data collection targeting weaning protocol performance, and 12 patients (21.8%) passed SBT on one or more occasions, were not extubated, and proceeded to tracheostomy.ConclusionsA standardized approach in which the decision for tracheostomy is based on objective measures of weaning performance may be a means of using this procedure more consistently and effectively.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.