• Pediatric pulmonology · Apr 2013

    Abbreviated multi-breath washout for calculation of lung clearance index.

    • Paul D Robinson, Janet Stocks, Paul Aurora, and Sooky Lum.
    • Portex Respiratory Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, London. dr.pdrobinson@gmail.com
    • Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2013 Apr 1;48(4):336-43.

    IntroductionVarious functional residual capacity (FRC) repeatability criteria have been proposed for lung clearance index (LCI) measurement by multiple breath washout (MBW). Adult guidelines recommend three technically acceptable tests with FRC values within 10%, whilst preschool guidelines recommend two such tests. Feasibility of and need for recommendations in children is unclear.MethodsRetrospective analysis of MBW data was undertaken in healthy control (n = 90) and cystic fibrosis (CF) subjects (n = 108) encompassing infancy, pre-school and school age ranges. Feasibility of FRC repeatability recommendations was investigated in those with three technically acceptable tests. Validity of mean LCI from the first two tests alone (vs. all three) was investigated by comparing mean data and sensitivity to detect abnormal peripheral airway function in CF.ResultsLCI coefficient of variation (CoV) was related to FRC CoV (P < 0.001) and disease category (P = 0.002). Application of adult repeatability criteria decreased LCI CoV (4.7 vs. 8.5%, P < 0.001), but had poor feasibility beyond infancy (62/150, 41%). Preschool recommendations increased feasibility but only to 70% overall. There was no difference in mean LCI (All three minus 1st two tests) in healthy controls [mean (95% CI) difference: 0.02 (-0.01, 0.06; P = 0.15)], this difference being statistically but not clinically significant in CF subjects [0.07 (0.00,0.13; P = 0.04)]. Sensitivity in CF subjects was unaffected.ConclusionAdult FRC repeatability recommendations improved LCI repeatability in pediatric subjects, but poor feasibility limited utility. In an experienced pediatric MBW center, recent preschool recommendations can be extended to two technically acceptable tests, irrespective of FRC repeatability, without significantly affecting mean LCI or compromising sensitivity.Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,706,662 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.