• Intensive care medicine · Jan 1987

    Comparative Study

    Evaluation of pediatric intensive care in Europe. A collaborative study by the European Club of Pediatric Intensive Care.

    • F Beaufils, J C Roze, D Azema, G François Hamoir, D Bloc, D Floret, H Stopfkuchen, C C de Jong de Vos Van Steenwijk, E Van der Voort, and F Mar Molinero.
    • Intensive Care Med. 1987 Jan 1;13(1):65-70.

    AbstractThere are no reports analyzing the results of pediatric intensive care in Europe. We evaluated quantitatively the severity of illness and the amount of care required for 714 consecutively admitted patients. We used simultaneously the Clinical Classification System (CCS) the Acute Physiology Score (APS) and the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS). Overall mortality at 1 month was 15%. The mortality rate was higher for CCS Class IV patients (32.3%) than for CCS III (4.5%) and CCS II (3.2%). The difference was significant between CCS IV and CCS III and II respectively (p less than 0.001) but no difference was observed between CCS III and CCS II. The patients were also classified among 7 major organ system failures: cardio vascular, respiratory, neurologic, gastro intestinal, renal, metabolic, hematologic. Three of them were primarily involved: respiratory (44.9%) cardio-vascular (20.7%), neurologic (18.8%). Among these 3 groups the highest mortality was observed in cardio-vascular patients (p less than 0.01 v.s. respiratory, p less than 0.05 v.s. neurologic). The death rate was 22% among the 264 neonates, 9.7% among the 247 infants (p less than 0.01) and 12.6% among the 198 children. APS and TISS scores increased significantly with the CCS classes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.